Sometimes it just fails
Have you ever tried joining a group, and after a few sessions you just had enough? A group where the game got boring, stupid or was just incredibly disappointing? Sometimes you know what went wrong, other times you don’t. I’ve been there a few times.
I post this because I read the latest entry of GM Struggles today, a blog written by Nifelhein, and it was a good read that actually shared some great insights. More specifically, I refer to his article Trying a New Game: A Matter of Trust. I will not give a resume on his article, though I would recommend reading it.
Why do I mention this article? Because Nifelhein touched briefly upon something I find tremendously important as a GM; expectations. I believe unmet expectations to be the single most important reason why some games just fail.
What do you mean ‘expectations’?
That’s a solid question. Nifelhein wrote:
Hell saying to almost anyone who plays tabletop that I want to GM a D&D game brings instant expectations…
The same goes for World of Darkness and Shadowrun. In fact, I would go so far as to say that it’s true for all systems out there, if the players know them prior to the invitation.
The point is; when you invite people to play a specific role-playing system, everyone has different expectations, and they often depend on their individual experiences with the game. This is both good and bad. Good because you can easily satisfy players, when you know what they expect, and bad because it can be hard when you don’t.
I’m not talking about “high” or “low” expectations. I’m talking about more sophisticated ones, like if you invite people to a session of Vampire, then they might expect it to be a game ripe with intrigue and backstabbing. I say “might”, because the inverse could also be true; a game with close to no intrigue, closer to a “supernatural action movie” game.
I have tried both, and they can both be fun, but it is rarely fun if you are sold on intrigue, and you don’t get any. If you hate “World of Action”, as I sometimes call the supernatural slug fest gaming style a lot of World of Darkness players seem to like, then you will probably be a little disappointed.
How do we avoid such disappointment?
Of course, there’s a lot of ways to deal with it. The only wrong thing to do is not to deal with it. What’s best most often depends on your players. A couple of ways to deal with it could be:
- Don’t just pitch the system, pitch the style of game you wish to play.
- Invite players that you know expect the same style as you do.
- Talk with the players before the game about their expectations.
- Discuss the style of the game to be played as a group, so everyone is on the same page.
This list is far from exhaustive, but these are the ones I have experience with, not only as a GM, in fact mostly as the player. I have positive experiences with all of them, and I can’t imagine how they could make your game worse.
Be honest to your players about the game. If you sell them on a game full of intrigue, don’t give them an action adventure. If you sell them on a game of fantasy adventure, don’t give them intrigue. I shouldn’t need to say this, but my experience is that people often sell their game as something it is not.
I don’t know why, but I expect it revolves around elitism. The “hack and slash” gaming style has received its fair share of verbal abuse over the years, so it’s not hard to understand why some GM’s don’t want to be associated with it, even though it’s how they GM. I don’t get why, because a lot of people actually enjoy hack and slash gaming, myself included if it’s how the GM sells the game to me.
My advice for everyone; think about expectations and be honest about your gaming style. It is harder to fix a broken game than it is to prevent it from breaking down due to unmet expectations.
Tags: Role-Playing Games
Add, share and use!
All work on this homepage is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.